• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer

602-631-9100

info@venjuris.com

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
Venjuris

Venjuris

  • Home
  • Start Here
  • About
    • In the Media
    • Blog
  • Attorneys
    • Michael F. Campillo
    • A. David Logan, Ph.D.
    • Joseph R. Meaney
    • John C. Mascari
    • Wendy K. Akbar
    • Carey Brandt Anthony
    • Ruth B. Carter
    • Richard E. Oney
    • Jason A. Bergeron
    • Sheetal Karnik, Ph.D.
  • Practices
    • Patents
    • Litigation
    • Trademarks
    • Copyrights
    • Trade Secrets
    • IP Licensing
    • International IP
    • Business Contracts
    • Internet Law
    • Mediation & ADR
Contact Us

A Breath of Fresh Air

By Venjuris

Last week, I had a refreshing and unusual telephone conversation with a patent examiner from the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). The examiner called me to discuss a patent application I had filed for a client. More specifically, he called because he had identified “allowable subject matter” and wanted to send me proposed claim amendments to put the application into condition for allowance, meaning it could proceed to the next step in the process of having a patent granted. While this might not seem like anything special — this was something I had never experienced in 18 years as a patent attorney.

Teamwork by RawPixel.com from Flickr (Creative Commons License)

My conversation with this examiner was refreshingly unusual for three reasons. First, the examiner called before issuing the first Office Action. (An Office Action is a written notice from the patent examiner that states your patent application cannot be granted as written, usually with an option to submit a revised application or arguments as to why the examiner is wrong.) Examiners never call before issuing an Office Action. Examiners always issue an Office Action first – and then I, as the applicant’s lawyer, have to then initiate a formal “telephone interview” in order to speak with the examiner about anything substantive. Second, the examiner had clearly made an attempt to understand this invention as disclosed in the specification. Normally, examiners make no discernible attempt to understand the disclosed invention. They simply focus on knocking out the claims with prior art. Third, the examiner proposed claim amendments that put the application into condition for allowance. Prior to this, I’ve never had an examiner propose claim amendments; they rely on the applicant or their attorney to propose claim amendments when there is a problem with the original application.

During my conversation, I mentioned to the examiner how refreshing it was to be working with the examiner to find allowable subject matter, rather than arguing with the examiner in response to a first Office Action.  In response, the examiner told me that over the years he had changed the way he examined patent applications. When he first started examining patents, he took a more traditional approach: focusing merely on claim rejection and issuing Office Actions in support of his rejections. But after his supervisor pointed out (1) that he had a much lower allowance rate than his peers and (2) that he was much slower than his peers in reaching allowance or final rejection, he decided adopt a new approach. Now, from the very beginning of his examination, he tried to understand the invention disclosed, not just the invention claimed. Then as he searched the prior art, he kept an eye out for ways that the disclosed invention was different from the prior art. If he found any differences, he would call the applicant before drafting an Office Action. He found this new approach to be a much more efficient, effective and rewarding way to examine patents – a breath of fresh air for patent applicants, indeed!

Jumping for Joy by Kilgarron from Flickr (Creative Commons License)

Applying for a patent through the USPTO is a challenging process, one that can easily take 1-3 years, even in the best of circumstances. If you pursue a patent to protect your intellectual property, it is important that you partner with an effective patent attorney who can shepherd your application through this process and help you avoid costly mistakes. In the worst-case scenario, your first patent application may be rejected and you’ll be barred from submitting the same idea for patent again.

If you need more information about filing or obtaining patent, please send us a message. We have attorneys licensed in Arizona, Connecticut, and New York, and we can handle federal intellectual property matters in any U.S. state and assist with international matters. For even more information, sure to connect with us on Facebook.

Post by patent attorney Joseph Meaney, edited by social media attorney Ruth Carter.

Filed Under: Intellectual Property, Patent Law Tagged With: arizona intellectual property lawyer, Arizona patent attorney, Arizona patent law firm, how to get a patent, how to patent, Joseph Meaney, patent claims, patent examiner, patent Office Action, Phoenix intellectual property lawyer, Phoenix patent attorney, phoenix patent law firm, Phoenix patent lawyer, Ruth Carter, USPTO patent application, Venjuris

Subscribe to our newsletter

Get the latest posts delivered right to your inbox

Reader Interactions

Ready to Get Your Legal Needs Handled?

Start by doing what's necessary, then do what's possible.

Book a Consult

Footer

Contact

1938 East Osborn Road Phoenix, AZ 85016

602-631-9100

602-631-4529

info@venjuris.com

Company

  • Home
  • About
  • Attorneys
  • Practices
  • Blog
  • Contact

Connect

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn

Venjuris

Venjuris practices business and intellectual property law and serves clients in Phoenix, Arizona, and the surrounding cities of Scottsdale, Tempe, Chandler, Gilbert, Glendale, Peoria, Avondale, Mesa, Paradise Valley, Sun City, Flagstaff, and Sedona, and in Maricopa County, Pima County, and Coconino County, Arizona (AZ). As a national practice, we have attorneys who are licensed in California (CA), Connecticut (CT), Virginia (VA), and New York (NY), and we provides services in numerous other states in the United States. Our international practice spans countries including Turkey, Ecuador, the United Kingdom, Switzerland, and a number of countries in Asia.

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn

Copyright © 2023 by VENJURIS.
Terms of Service | Privacy Policy Return to top