• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer

602-631-9100

info@venjuris.com

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
Venjuris

Venjuris

  • Home
  • Start Here
  • About
    • In the Media
    • Blog
  • Attorneys
    • Michael F. Campillo
    • A. David Logan, Ph.D.
    • Joseph R. Meaney
    • John C. Mascari
    • Wendy K. Akbar
    • Carey Brandt Anthony
    • Ruth B. Carter
    • Richard E. Oney
    • Jason A. Bergeron
    • Sheetal Karnik, Ph.D.
  • Practices
    • Patents
    • Litigation
    • Trademarks
    • Copyrights
    • Trade Secrets
    • IP Licensing
    • International IP
    • Business Contracts
    • Internet Law
    • Mediation & ADR
Contact Us

Never Saw THAT Coming (Back to the Future Edition)

By Venjuris

Inventors, please take note. When you hire a consultant to build a prototype or otherwise help you get your product to market, make sure that your contract specifies who owns any intellectual property that might arise during the consultancy. If you don’t, you may end up sharing patent ownership with your consultant.

Surprising? Yes. But this trap is easy to avoid once you know the risk.

“Back in Time” by JD Hancock from Flickr (Creative Commons License)

Here is an example for illustration. Let’s say you just came up with a great new idea: the time machine.  You’d be rich for sure. Naturally, you are not in the business of time machines, so you hire a consultant to help prototype your invention. After some effort, you and your consultant create a machine that can transport you through time as long as you apply 1.21 gigawatts of power to a flux capacitor going 88 miles an hour. Because the original idea was “your invention,” you can file a patent without naming the consultant as an inventor, right? Probably not. Unless your consultant signed a contract agreeing to assign all patent rights to you, filing a patent without naming your consultant as an inventor will most likely expose you to a lawsuit from the consultant claiming ownership in the patent.

As we previously discussed, inventorship depends on two things: (1) what is ultimately claimed as the invention, and (2) who contributed the claimed invention. Continuing with our above example, it’s easy to evaluate this case if one of these scenarios applies:

  1. If it was your idea to apply 1.21 gigawatts of power to a flux capacitor going 88 miles an hour (and your consultant merely followed your instructions), then you are the inventor and owner of the patent claim. See Ethicon, Inc. v. U.S. Surgical Corp., 135 F.3d 1456, 1460 (Fed. Cir. 1998).
  2. However, if you merely asked your consultant to build you a time machine, but left it to your consultant to figure out how to do it, then your consultant is the inventor. See Nartron Corp. v. Schukra U.S.A. Inc., 558 F.3d 1352, 1359 (Fed. Cir. 2009).

More than likely, though, your case will not be so cut and dry. In most cases, you will have come up some elements of the invention (like the flux capacitor) and the consultant will have come up with another (like the need to go 88 miles an hour). In cases where both you and your consultant contributed something to the claimed invention, you and your consultant will be deemed “joint inventors.”

In the end, it is always better to hire a consultant with a written agreement that expressly addresses these issues. By getting any third party that works on your invention to agree to assign any intellectual property arising out of the project to you, then you can own 100% of the patent – even though you might have to share inventorship (meaning you have to list them as an inventor on the patent application, but you will retain all of the rights in the patent itself). Typically, a consultant is more than willing to assign any patent rights to you at the beginning of the contract. But if you wait until after the time machine successfully works to ask your consultant to assign you all the patent rights, expect the answer to be “No.”

If you need more information on any patent issue, please send us a message. We have lawyers licensed in Arizona, Connecticut, New York, and Virginia, and we can handle federal intellectual property matters in any U.S. state and assist with international matters. For even more information, sure to connect with us on Facebook.

Post by patent attorney Joseph Meaney, edited by social media attorney Ruth Carter.

Filed Under: Intellectual Property, Patent Law Tagged With: Arizona patent attorney, co-inventor, co-owner, inventorship, joint inventor, joint owner, Joseph Meaney, patent assignment, patent ownership, phoenix patent law firm, Phoenix patent lawyer, prototype, Ruth Carter, time machine, Venjuris

Subscribe to our newsletter

Get the latest posts delivered right to your inbox

Reader Interactions

Ready to Get Your Legal Needs Handled?

Start by doing what's necessary, then do what's possible.

Book a Consult

Footer

Contact

1938 East Osborn Road Phoenix, AZ 85016

602-631-9100

602-631-4529

info@venjuris.com

Company

  • Home
  • About
  • Attorneys
  • Practices
  • Blog
  • Contact

Connect

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn

Venjuris

Venjuris practices business and intellectual property law and serves clients in Phoenix, Arizona, and the surrounding cities of Scottsdale, Tempe, Chandler, Gilbert, Glendale, Peoria, Avondale, Mesa, Paradise Valley, Sun City, Flagstaff, and Sedona, and in Maricopa County, Pima County, and Coconino County, Arizona (AZ). As a national practice, we have attorneys who are licensed in California (CA), Connecticut (CT), Virginia (VA), and New York (NY), and we provides services in numerous other states in the United States. Our international practice spans countries including Turkey, Ecuador, the United Kingdom, Switzerland, and a number of countries in Asia.

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn

Copyright © 2023 by VENJURIS.
Terms of Service | Privacy Policy Return to top